For the Public

Can your concern be resolved directly with the licensee?

Before you submit a complaint to the College, if you feel comfortable doing so, you should consider speaking directly with the licensee. This is often the quickest and easiest way to have your concern addressed.

You can ask questions and seek explanations from licensees. This can be done while receiving care, or after care. Sometimes talking to the licensee to understand what happened can resolve your concerns. If you don’t get the answers you are seeking, then you can submit a complaint about the licensee to the College.

Who can we investigate?

We regulate audiologists, dietitians, hearing instrument practitioners, occupational therapists, opticians, optometrists, physical therapists, psychologists, and speech-language pathologists. We can investigate complaints about these registered professionals. Use the Public Registry to verify the licensure of a current CHCPBC licensee.

What can we investigate?

The College can only investigate complaints that fall within our statutory mandate. The College protects the public from harm and discrimination. For a complaint to be accepted for investigation, it must relate to unprofessional conduct or incompetent practice by a College licensee. Such conduct may include complaints about client care or a licensee’s conduct, including sexual misconduct or discrimination.

The College is unable to:

• address business disputes between health professionals
• order a specific assessment or treatment
• provide advice on patient diagnosis and care
• provide legal advice or legal assistance
• mediate or address employment disputes

Can I make an anonymous complaint?

When you submit a complaint about a licensee or provide information as part of a complaint, your identity is disclosed to the licensee

This is because it may be difficult (and sometimes impossible) for us to investigate your concerns if we do not have your name or contact details to clarify and/or seek further information. Additionally:

• Without using your name, we may not be able to gather necessary information from other entities about your concerns, and
• We need to ensure those involved in the complaint are given a fair opportunity to respond to concerns, and it may be difficult to explain the concerns without disclosing certain information.

A copy of your complaint and evidence gathered through the course of the investigation of your concern will be provided to the licensee who is the subject of the complaint.

Request an identity protection order

Although you cannot make an anonymous complaint, you may request to have your identity protected from others involved in the complaints process. To make this request, you must fill out and email to complaints@chcpbc.org the Identity Protection Order (IPO) application form (PDF).

If you are making a complaint on behalf of another person, you may submit the IPO form for the affected person’s identity to be protected.

The College recommends that you apply for an IPO as early as possible, such as when you submit your complaint. If a request for an IPO is received later in the process, the licensee may have already been told of the complaint and your identity.

An IPO will only be granted in certain circumstances because licensees generally need to know who is involved in a complaint to respond to the concerns.

How does CHCPBC decide whether to grant an IPO?

On receipt of an IPO application, CHCPBC will review the form and decide whether to grant the request. In deciding whether to issue an IPO, the College will consider the nature of the concerns raised and whether it is possible to investigate the complaint if a person’s identity is withheld. Typically, it is necessary to disclose your name to the licensee who is being investigated so that they have an opportunity to understand the concerns raised about them and provide a full response. You will be informed of the decision in writing.

If an IPO is granted, it may grant full or partial protection. If the decision is made to partially protect a person’s identity, you will be informed:

• What information might be disclosed
• Who the information might be disclosed to
• What limits apply to disclosure
• How the investigation may be conducted, given the partial protection order

Complaints about sexual misconduct or sexual abuse

We recognize that coming forward with a complaint about sexual misconduct or sexual abuse can be very difficult.

We investigate all complaints against licensees, including:

• alleged inappropriate sexual comments;
• alleged inappropriate touching; and
• alleged sexual abuse.

The College has a zero-tolerance policy for conduct or behaviour towards patients/clients that is sexual in nature.

Professional misconduct of a sexual nature is a misuse of power that violates the human dignity of patients/clients seeking care for themselves or their relatives, or both. It is a violation of the relationship of trust and confidence that exists between patients/clients and licensees. Such professional misconduct by any licensee, providing any type of care in any practice setting, will not be tolerated by the College.

It is not considered sexual misconduct or abuse when a licensee touches an intimate part of a client’s body for a valid purpose with the client’s informed consent.

Complaints about discrimination

The BC Human Rights Code protects people from discrimination and harassment based on personal characteristics, such as race, ancestry, colour, sex, sexual orientation, religion, physical or mental disability, family status, place of origin, marital status, and age.

Discrimination in health care happens when a person is treated unfairly or denied access to services in a health care setting based on the personal characteristics protected by the BC Human Rights Code.

The College will investigate discrimination complaints made by a patient or a person who witnesses discrimination, such as a family member, friend, or other concerned person.

Support Programs

Under the Health Professions and Occupations Act, health regulatory colleges are required to provide and fund a Support Program for individuals who have made a complaint that they have experienced sexual misconduct, sexual abuse, and/or discrimination by a licensee. The Support Program offers access to:

1. Information services: College staff will provide information about the regulatory complaints process and the individual’s rights, including information about accessing the Support Program.
2. Support services: The College can facilitate access to counselling and trauma-informed cultural supports to support individuals who have experienced sexual misconduct, sexual abuse or discrimination by a licensee.
3. Support worker services: The College can assign an independent, experienced, and qualified support worker to support people who have experienced sexual abuse, sexual misconduct, and/or discrimination. The support worker can help explain your rights and role in the complaints process and accompany you to interviews or hearings regarding your complaint.

The College recognizes that complaint investigations can be traumatic. The Support Program is available to help. If you have submitted a complaint about sexual misconduct, sexual abuse, and/or discrimination and would like to apply for support, please complete and submit the Support Programs Application form (PDF).

If you have a concern about the conduct or competence of a CHCPBC licensee, you may submit a regulatory complaint to the College. CHCPBC can investigate and resolve complaints from members of the public about the capacity, competence, and conduct of the licensed health and care professionals it regulates.

To confirm the person you have a complaint about is a CHCPBC licensee, please check the CHCPBC Public Registry. If the person is licensed by the College, you may use the Regulatory Complaint Form — For Members of the Public to submit a complaint. Members of the public are encouraged to use the form, as doing so helps the College capture all the information we need to properly review and act upon your complaint.

However, if you are unable to use the form, you may submit your complaint through the following options:

• Email: complaints@chcpbc.org
• Mail, addressed to: Director, Investigations, Discipline & Monitoring, College of Health and Care Professionals of BC (CHCPBC), 900-200 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 1S4
• Fax: 1-604-608-9863

You must provide your name and contact information when submitting a complaint. CHCPBC will not share your personal contact information (i.e., personal email address, phone number, and home address) with the licensee. For more information regarding CHCPBC’s collection, use, and disclosure of personal information, please see our Privacy Notice.

While complaints cannot be made anonymously, you may apply for an Identity Protection Order, which may keep your name and/or details about you confidential from the licensee you are complaining about, and/or other parties. For more information about Identity Protection Orders, including how to apply for one, please see Things To Know Before You Submit a Regulatory Complaint.

If you require assistance to submit the complaint form, or have any questions, please email complaints@chcpbc.org or call CHCPBC at 604-742-6715.

There is no time limit on submitting a complaint.

The Duties to Report Licensees division of the Health Professions and Occupations Act outlines circumstances in which licensees, and non-licensees in some cases, have a duty to submit a regulatory report with respect to another licensee.

The Act requires that a licensee must make a regulatory report with respect to another licensee if the first licensee has reasonable grounds to believe that:

• the other licensee is not fit to practise;
• the continued practice of a designated health profession by the other licensee presents a significant risk of harm to the public; or
• the other licensee has committed an act of sexual misconduct, sexual abuse or discrimination.

If you’re not a health professional yourself, you may still have a legal duty to report.

If you are an employer, business partner, or hospital administrator and you believe a licensee poses a serious risk to the public, or has committed sexual misconduct or discrimination, you are required to make a formal report if any of the following happened:

• You fired them, or suspended or restricted their ability to work
• You ended a business or professional partnership with them
• You were about to take any of those steps, but the licensee quit, walked away, or ended the relationship first before you had the chance.

To confirm the person you are making a regulatory report about is a CHCPBC licensee, please check the CHCPBC Public Registry. If the person is a licensed by the College, you may use the Regulatory Report Form – For Licensees (PDF). Using the form helps the College capture all the information we need to properly review and act upon your report. This is a fillable PDF form that you can complete and submit by email to complaints@chcpbc.org.

However, if you are unable to use the form you may submit your regulatory report through the following options:

• Email: complaints@chcpbc.org
• Mail, addressed to: Director, Investigations, Discipline & Monitoring, College of Health and Care Professionals of BC (CHCPBC), 900-200 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 1S4
• Fax: 1-604-608-9863

You must provide your name and contact information when submitting your report. CHCPBC will not share your personal contact information (i.e., personal email address, phone number, and home address) with the licensee. For more information regarding CHCPBC’s collection, use, and disclosure of personal information, please see our Privacy Notice. 

While regulatory reports cannot be made anonymously, you may apply for an Identity Protection Order, which may keep your name and/or details about you confidential from the licensee you are reporting, and/or other parties. For more information about Identity Protection Orders, including how to apply for one, please see Things To Know Before You Submit a Regulatory Complaint.

Submitting a regulatory complaint triggers a structured, transparent, and safety–focused process. The College’s role is not to advocate for either party, but to protect the public by ensuring that licensees meet the standards expected of them.

1. CHCPBC receives and reviews your complaint

Once you submit a complaint to the College, staff review it to confirm:

• the person being complained about is regulated by CHCPBC,
• the concern falls within the College’s mandate to protect the public, and
• the information provided is sufficient to begin an assessment.

If more information is needed, the College may contact you for clarification.

If the person or the matter is outside the College’s jurisdiction, you will be informed and redirected to the appropriate body when possible.

2. The College assesses your concern

The College evaluates whether the complaint raises issues related to:

• professional misconduct or actionable conduct,
• fitness to practice (capacity and competence issues),
• breaches of ethical or professional standards,
• discrimination, sexual misconduct, or sexual abuse, which receive additional oversight under the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA), or
• other risks to public safety.

3. CHCPBC notifies the health professional who is the subject of the complaint

In most cases, the licensee is informed that a complaint has been made and given a copy of the complaint. They are given an opportunity to respond and provide their perspective. The College may also gather records, interview witnesses, or review relevant information.

4. The College conducts an investigation (if required)

If the initial assessment shows that further review is needed, the College opens a formal investigation. Investigators may:

• review clinical records,
• interview the complainant, licensee, or others,
• examine workplace or contextual information,
• gather expert opinions when needed.

The goal is to understand what happened and whether the licensee’s conduct or competence met the required professional standards.

5. CHCPBC decides on an outcome

After reviewing all information, the College decides on the most appropriate outcome. Possible outcomes include:

• No further action, if appropriate in the circumstances,
• Quality or practice improvement measures, such as education or supervision,
• Limits or conditions on the licensee’s practice,
• Suspension of the licensee’s practice,
• Citations for discipline hearings, which under the HPOA are handled by an independent Health Professions Discipline Tribunal, which is part of the Health Professions and Occupations Regulatory Oversight Office, rather than the College itself.

6. Outcomes may be published on the CHCPBC website

The HPOA increases transparency by requiring that all disciplinary actions be published on the CHCPBC website.

7. You are informed of the result

CHCPBC communicates to you the outcome of your complaint and explains the reasons for the decision. While some details may be limited by privacy laws, the College aims to be as transparent as possible.

Additional Protections Under the HPOA

Support for complainants

The HPOA includes additional measures to support people who have experienced:

• discrimination,
• sexual abuse,
• sexual misconduct.

These measures may include identity protection orders and support programs. For information, see Things To Know Before You Submit a Regulatory Complaint and Complaints About Sexual Misconduct, Sexual Abuse, and/or Discrimination.

Commitment to cultural safety

• The HPOA requires regulators to take proactive steps to ensure culturally safe, discrimination–free processes for Indigenous Peoples and other communities.

The Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA) establishes the Health Professions and Occupations Regulatory Oversight Office (HPOROO), a new, independent office separate from health profession regulatory colleges, including CHCPBC.

Within the HPOROO, the Health Professions Discipline Tribunal oversees the discipline process for regulated health professions in BC.

The Director of Discipline leads the Discipline Tribunal, which is also independent from the colleges.

The Discipline Tribunal’s role is to:

• Decide on requests from health profession regulatory colleges to issue citations
• Approve agreements to resolve certain cases without a hearing
• Hold disciplinary hearings when necessary
• Hear appeals from disciplinary hearings
• Decide what information should be made public after each case is finished

Overview

Under the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA), regulatory colleges continue to receive and investigate complaints against health professionals.

However, the HPOA establishes a new Health Professions Discipline Tribunal, which is part of the independent Health Professions and Occupations Regulatory Oversight Office (HPOROO). The Discipline Tribunal conducts hearings and determines discipline for health professionals who have been investigated by their regulatory college following a complaint.

The Discipline Tribunal is led by the HPOROO Director of Discipline, who is not involved in hearings but oversees the Discipline Tribunal as a whole.

Independent discipline panels appointed by the Director of Discipline consist of a professional of the same profession subject to discipline and a member of the public. When choosing panel members, the Director of Discipline considers if the members have the expertise needed to conduct the discipline hearing in a manner that mitigates any potential trauma that may arise from an adversarial process.

The Discipline Tribunal determines the disciplinary action against a professional who has been found to have committed misconduct; however, it is the regulatory college who is responsible for enforcement of disciplinary orders.

The role is to:

• Decide on requests from the regulatory colleges to issue citations
• Approve agreements to resolve certain cases without a hearing
• Hold disciplinary hearings when necessary
• Hear appeals from disciplinary hearings
• Decide what information should be made public after the hearing is finished

What happens in a discipline hearing under the HPOA?

If a matter proceeds to a discipline hearing, evidence is presented to a Discipline Tribunal hearing panel and both the College and respondent have an opportunity to be heard.

During the discipline hearing:

• The College presents the results of its investigation
• The licensee, who is entitled to be represented by a lawyer, presents their response to the charges in the citation and may bring evidence to support their account of events
• Witnesses may be called, including experts

Discipline hearings are open to the public, except in limited circumstances where privacy, safety, or trauma‑informed considerations require a closed session.

What happens after a discipline hearing?

Following the discipline hearing:

The Discipline Tribunal must decide whether a respondent lacks competence and/or has committed an act of misconduct.

• If the Discipline Tribunal decides that a respondent does not lack competence or has not committed an act of misconduct, the discipline panel must make an order to dismiss the citation and any order made during the course of an investigation ceases to apply on the date of the decision.
• If the Discipline Tribunal decides that a respondent lacks competence or has committed an act of misconduct, the discipline panel must either:
  • Make an order to dismiss the citation if they do not think a disciplinary order is appropriate; or
  • Make one or more disciplinary orders and possibly an order for hearing costs.

Disciplinary orders issued by the Discipline Tribunal may include:

• Education or remediation requirements
• Limits or conditions on practice
• Suspension
• Cancellation of the licence or
• Other protective measures.

The Discipline Tribunal also decides what information should be made public after each case is finished. See Public Notices.

For more information, see the Health Professions Discipline Tribunal section of the HPOROO website.

Questions about the Discipline Tribunal or the actions it may take can be sent to the Tribunal: tribunal@hporoo.ca.

Unauthorized practice

CHCPBC takes the unauthorized practice of the professions we regulate seriously. Unauthorized practice and unauthorized use of reserved titles are subject to legal action.

Anyone providing services within the regulated scope of practice of registered audiologists, dietitians, hearing instrument practitioners, occupational therapists, opticians, optometrists, physical therapists, psychologists, and speech-language pathologists in BC, and who does not hold the required licensure status with CHCPBC or is not being supervised by a licensee, is breaking the law. Performing aspects of practice reserved for these regulated health professionals is unauthorized practice.

BC has a shared scope of practice and restricted activities model for regulated health professions under the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA). This regulatory model was designed to enable inter-professional practice and team-based care, and to balance public safety and consumer choice. For more information on this regulatory model, please see Shared scope of practice and restricted activities on the BC Ministry of Health’s HPOA webpage.

Restricted activities are a narrowly defined list of invasive, higher risk activities that must not be performed by any person in the course of providing health services, except the regulated health professionals who have been granted specific authority to do so by regulations enacted under the HPOA.

A person engages in unauthorized practice when they perform a restricted activity without being registered as the type of health professional who has been granted authority to provide that restricted activity as part of their services.

In addition, licensees who continue to practise after their licence has lapsed, may be subject to investigation and legal action.

Unauthorized use of exclusive titles

Using a title that is reserved for audiologists, dietitians, hearing instrument practitioners, occupational therapists, opticians, optometrists, physical therapists, psychologists, and speech-language pathologists in BC without current CHCPBC licensure is unlawful.

CHCPBC takes the unauthorized use of a title reserved by law for health professionals we regulate seriously. Exclusive titles (also called reserved or protected titles) are a central and critical public protection element of BC’s health professions regulatory framework. For more information about exclusive titles in BC, and to see which titles are reserved for CHCPBC licensees, please see Exclusive titles on the BC Ministry of Health’s HPOA webpage.

Unregistered individuals are legally prohibited from using these exclusive titles or their abbreviations.

Some individuals who are registrants of a health profession regulated by another health profession regulatory college are also granted legal authority to use some of these titles.

Contacting CHCPBC with concerns about unauthorized practice or unauthorized use of exclusive titles

If you have concerns about someone engaging in unauthorized practice of a profession CHCPBC regulates or improperly using an exclusive title, contact the College at: complaints@chcpbc.org.

When you submit your concern, please include:

• The name and business name of the unauthorized provider
• Contact information for the unauthorized provider (if available)
• Any relevant website and/or social media links
• Screen shots and any other documentary evidence relevant to the concern

Under the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA), CHCPBC operates monitoring programs essential to public protection and professional accountability. Our monitoring functions encompass two distinct areas:

1. Compliance monitoring
2. Unauthorized practice monitoring

Compliance monitoring

Compliance monitoring ensures that licensees adhere to all undertakings, agreements, disciplinary orders, and conditions placed on their practice authority, including practice restrictions, supervision requirements, and remedial education obligations. Through systematic verification, regular reporting, and proactive oversight, we track compliance with disciplinary orders and intervene when non-compliance threatens public safety.

Unauthorized practice monitoring

Our unauthorized practice monitoring program fulfills the statutory duty under the HPOA’s requirements to identify, investigate, and take action against persons who perform restricted activities or aspects of practice without authorization, use protected professional titles without entitlement, provide false or misleading information about their qualifications, or otherwise contravene the HPOA’s prohibitions on unauthorized practice (sections 371-377). This involves investigating complaints, gathering evidence, entering into compliance agreements, seeking court injunctions when necessary, and referring serious violations for prosecution with penalties that can include fines and imprisonment.

Both monitoring programs work in concert to protect the public from harm, maintain the integrity of regulated health professions, and ensure that only qualified, authorized practitioners provide health services to British Columbians within their designated scope of practice.

At this time there are no public notices for this profession issued under the Health Professions and Occupations Act. See Archived Public Notices for notices issued under the Health Professions Act.

At this time there are no public notices for this profession issued under the Health Professions and Occupations Act. See Archived Public Notices for notices issued under the Health Professions Act.

Steven Wirtanen – Extraordinary Action – March 30, 2026

See Archived Public Notices for other notices issued under the Health Professions Act.

At this time there are no public notices for this profession issued under the Health Professions and Occupations Act. See Archived Public Notices for notices issued under the Health Professions Act.

Sohrab Mohammadi, former registrant – Penalty Decision – July 9, 2025

Sohrab Mohammadi, former registrant – Discipline Panel Decision – August 13, 2024

See Archived Public Notices for other notices issued under the Health Professions Act

At this time there are no public notices for this profession issued under the Health Professions and Occupations Act. See Archived Public Notices for notices issued under the Health Professions Act.

Nozar (Daniel) Azani (PDF) – Extraordinary Action – March 30, 2026

Brandon Sum (PDF) – Consent Agreement – January 19, 2026

Daljodh Khaira (PDF) – Consent Agreement – December 23, 2025

Richard Johnson (PDF) – Consent Agreement – May 26, 2025

Lilian Chung (PDF) – Consent Agreement – May 14, 2025

Luke Ming Huey Lee (PDF) – Extraordinary Action – April 30, 2025

Wilfred Ly (PDF) – Consent Agreement – April 10, 2025

Sanjay Amrutkar (PDF) – Consent Agreement – August 1, 2024

Madhavan Kulasekaran (PDF) – Consent Agreement – August 1, 2024

Ryan Emberley (PDF) – Consent Agreement – June 19, 2023

George Mah (PDF) – Consent Agreement, Updated – April 24, 2023

Jacob Arie Cornelis Kalkman (PDF) – Consent Agreement – January 19, 2023

John McCordic (PDF) – Consent Agreement – August 27, 2021

Edward Middleton (PDF) – Consent Agreement – July 22, 2021

Angela Simpson (PDF) – Consent Agreement – May 18, 2021

Guy Robertson (PDF) – Consent Agreement – February 2, 2021

Rodney Mitchell (PDF) – Consent Agreement – March 31, 2020

Stephen Witvoet (PDF) – Consent Agreement – March 26, 2020

See Archived Public Notices for other notices issued under the Health Professions Act.

James Blackburn – Extraordinary Action – January 5, 2026

Sarah Patrick – Consent Agreement – May 31, 2025

Scott McKee – Limits and Conditions under section 20(2.1)(a) of the HPA Public Notification – May 1, 2024

Stephen Porter – Undertakings – December 29, 2017

See Archived Public Notices for other notices issued under the Health Professions Act.

Tarndeep Samra – Consent Agreement – March 31, 2026

Sabitha Anirudhan Bhavaniveli – Extraordinary Action – Updated October 10, 2025

Roujan Khaledan – Extraordinary Action – Updated – December 12, 2025

Michelle Nightingale – Consent Agreement – April 10, 2024

Tarndeep Samra – Extraordinary Action – November 20, 2023

Sherri Millham – Consent Agreement – Updated – October 3, 2023

Caroline Chow – Extraordinary Action – August 11, 2023

Agnes Gradowski – Consent Agreement – May 2, 2023

Agnes Gradowski – Extraordinary Action – December 23, 2022

Nicolette Waite – Consent Agreement – December 8, 2022

Penelope Bacsfalvi – Consent Agreement – December 5, 2022

Michelle Nightingale – Extraordinary Action – November 3, 2022

Caroline Chow – Extraordinary Action – July 28, 2022

Agnes Gradowski – Consent Agreement – October 5, 2021

Karen Ursel – Consent Agreement – July 21, 2021

Carla Willock – Consent Agreement – July 13, 2021

Wendy Young – Order – April 28, 2021

David Kurbis – Consent Agreement – April 23, 2020

Kathleen Oddoux – Order – September 28, 2020

Kathleen Oddoux – Order – July 23, 2020

Wendy Young – Order – June 18, 2020

Kathleen Oddoux – Consent Agreement – August 7, 2019

Lana Rados – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – September 26, 2023

Anonymous – Unlawful Use of a Reserved Title – June 23, 2023

Gregory Mistal – Unlawful Use of a Reserved Title – May 26, 2023

Nagwa Yacoub – Unlawful Use of a Reserved Title – March 1, 2023

Xander Patrice Phoenix (Updated) – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – May 27, 2022

Victor Leiserson – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – July 16, 2021

Phyllis Ohm – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – November 29, 2019

Holly Smith – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – August 19, 2019

Anthony Wang – Unlawful Use of a Reserved Title – May 8, 2019

Dorothy Mae Ryan – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – January 18, 2019

Lucien Larre – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – June 4, 2018

Holly Prochnau (Fourchalk) – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – March 21, 2017

Anthony Wang – Unlawful Use of a Reserved Title – December 2, 2016

Nell Consiglio – Board Motion Regarding Public Safety – December 21, 2015

Audiologists

Gregory Mistal (PDF) – Consent Agreement – May 4, 2021

Dietitians

Kameldeep Hundal (PDF) – Consent Agreement – December 13, 2017

Yuh-Huey (Angela) Liou (PDF) – Consent Agreement – February 20, 2017

Hearing Instrument Practitioners

Matthew Lam (PDF) – Consent Agreement – June 28, 2022

Gregory Mistal (PDF) – Consent Agreement – May 4, 2021

C. Marke Hambley (PDF) – Consent Agreement – January 24, 2019

Occupational Therapists

Christopher Thiessen (PDF) – Discipline Order – November 2, 2020

Gurpeet Buttar (PDF) – Discipline Order – July 26, 2018

Opticians

Mahmood Savji (PDF) – Revised Consent Agreement – January 29, 2024

Shena Storness-Bliss (PDF) – Undertaking – May 8, 2023

Mahmood Savji (PDF) – Consent Agreement – May 6, 2021

Tom Hoedeman (PDF) – Consent Agreement – October 15, 2020

Charles Cheung (PDF) – Undertaking – September 11, 2020

William Lougheed (PDF) – Press Release – August 3, 2017

Optometrists

Wai-Sing Vincent Wu (PDF) – Discipline Notice – July 1, 2016

Jerry Mackenzie (PDF) – Discipline Notice – August 27, 2015

Physical Therapists

Gulab Dhaliwal (PDF) – Extraordinary Action – Updated March 4, 2026

Izuchukwu Nwoba (PDF) – Extraordinary Action – Updated November 10, 2025

Daljodh Khaira (PDF) – Extraordinary Action – Updated September 3, 2025

Sanjay Amrutkar (PDF) – Consent Agreement, Updated – September 5, 2024

Riyad Zuber (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated – March 8, 2023

Stefan Iorio (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated – July 7, 2021

Ahmad Rezvani (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated – June 17, 2021

Shahab Rezania (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated – June 15, 2021

Muralidharan Ramadass (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated December 10, 2020

Jagroop Bains (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated September 22, 2020

Stephen Witvoet (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated July 2, 2019

Chetan Phachu (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated June 18, 2019

Ross McFadyen (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated May 13, 2019

Amanda Wong (PDF) – Extraordinary Action, Updated – March 5, 2019

Waymen Wong (PDF) – Consent Agreement – November 20, 2018

Psychologists

Barry Stein (PDF) – Undertakings – August 5, 2024

Karla Saruk (PDF) – Undertakings – April 5, 2023

William Handley (PDF) – Undertakings – February 9, 2023

Emilie Kemlo (PDF) – Undertakings – May 26, 2022

Kevin Miller (PDF) – Undertakings – May 25, 2022

Lori Ladd (PDF) – Undertakings – May 5, 2022

Irina Tarasenco (PDF) – Undertakings – October 8, 2021

Lloyd Shewchuk (PDF) – Undertakings – May 20, 2021

Katherine Kot (PDF) – Notice of Resignation While Undertaking in Effect – October 19, 2020

Owen James (PDF) – Undertakings – July 30, 2020

Kevin Miller (PDF) – Undertakings – July 30, 2020

Cindy Hardy (PDF) – Undertakings – December 6, 2019

Katherine Kot (PDF) – Undertakings – August 20, 2019

Carol Macpherson (PDF) – Undertakings – February 14, 2019

Allan Posthuma (PDF) – Undertakings – January 1, 2019

Melina Dayne (PDF) – Extraordinary Action – November 30, 2018

Eva Skerl (PDF) – Undertakings – June 21, 2018

Charlotte Sutker (PDF) – Undertakings – October 5, 2017

Anthony Chan (PDF) – Undertakings – October 5, 2017

Eva Skerl (PDF) – Undertakings – June 13, 2017

Serena Patterson (PDF) – Undertakings – May 24, 2017

Carol Denniston (PDF) – Undertakings – July 21, 2016

Serena Patterson – Undertakings – March 31, 2016

David Wong – Undertakings – October 9, 2015